Governance models for nature-based solutions

Seventeen cases from Germany

verfasst von

Aude Zingraff-Hamed, Frank Hüesker, Christian Albert, Mario Brillinger, Joshua Huang, Gerd Lupp, Sebastian Scheuer, Mareen Schlätel, Barbara Schröter

Abstract

Nature-based solutions (NBS) for mitigating climate change are gaining popularity. The number of NBS is increasing, but research gaps still exist at the governance level. The objectives of this paper are (i) to give an overview of the implemented NBS for flood risk management and mitigation in Germany, (ii) to identify governance models that are applied, and (iii) to explore the differences between these models. The results of a hierarchical clustering procedure and a qualitative analysis show that while no one-size-fits-all governance model exists, polycentricism is an important commonality between the projects. The study concludes by highlighting the need for further research on traditional governance model reconversion and paradigm changes. We expect the findings to identify what has worked in the past, as well as what is important for the implementation of NBS for flood risk management in future projects.

Organisationseinheit(en)

Institut für Umweltplanung

Externe Organisation(en)

Technische Universität München (TUM)
Helmholtz Zentrum München - Deutsches Forschungszentrum für Gesundheit und Umwelt
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Ruhr-Universität Bochum
Leibniz-Zentrum für Agrarlandschaftsforschung (ZALF) e.V.

Typ

Artikel

Journal

AMBIO

Band

50

Seiten

1610-1627

Anzahl der Seiten

18

ISSN

0044-7447

Publikationsdatum

08.2021

Publikationsstatus

Veröffentlicht

Peer-reviewed

Ja

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Umweltchemie, Geografie, Planung und Entwicklung, Ökologie

Ziele für nachhaltige Entwicklung

SDG 13 – Klimaschutzmaßnahmen

Elektronische Version(en)

https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-020-01412-x (Zugang: Offen)