Publications (FIS)

Governance models for nature-based solutions

Seventeen cases from Germany

authored by
Aude Zingraff-Hamed, Frank Hüesker, Christian Albert, Mario Brillinger, Joshua Huang, Gerd Lupp, Sebastian Scheuer, Mareen Schlätel, Barbara Schröter
Abstract

Nature-based solutions (NBS) for mitigating climate change are gaining popularity. The number of NBS is increasing, but research gaps still exist at the governance level. The objectives of this paper are (i) to give an overview of the implemented NBS for flood risk management and mitigation in Germany, (ii) to identify governance models that are applied, and (iii) to explore the differences between these models. The results of a hierarchical clustering procedure and a qualitative analysis show that while no one-size-fits-all governance model exists, polycentricism is an important commonality between the projects. The study concludes by highlighting the need for further research on traditional governance model reconversion and paradigm changes. We expect the findings to identify what has worked in the past, as well as what is important for the implementation of NBS for flood risk management in future projects.

Organisation(s)
Institute of Environmental Planning
External Organisation(s)
Technical University of Munich (TUM)
Helmholtz Zentrum München - German Research Center for Environmental Health
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Ruhr-Universität Bochum
Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF)
Type
Article
Journal
AMBIO
Volume
50
Pages
1610-1627
No. of pages
18
ISSN
0044-7447
Publication date
08.2021
Publication status
Published
Peer reviewed
Yes
ASJC Scopus subject areas
Environmental Chemistry, Geography, Planning and Development, Ecology
Sustainable Development Goals
SDG 13 - Climate Action
Electronic version(s)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-020-01412-x (Access: Open)